For the first time in history, the United  States Congress is rumored to be considering a value added tax (VAT),  a sort of National sales tax. Check out the article below on the topic  courtesy of the  Washington Post. 
 
With budget deficits soaring and President  Obama pushing a trillion-dollar-plus expansion of health coverage, some  Washington policymakers are taking a fresh look at a money-making idea  long considered politically taboo: a national sales tax.
 
Common around the world, including in  Europe, such a tax -- called a value-added tax, or VAT -- has not been  seriously considered in the United States. But advocates say few other  options can generate the kind of money the nation will need to avert  fiscal calamity.
At a White House conference earlier this  year on the government's budget problems, a roomful of tax experts pleaded  with Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner to consider a VAT. A recent  flurry of books and papers on the subject is attracting genuine, if  furtive, interest in Congress. And last month, after wrestling with  the White House over the massive deficits projected under Obama's policies,  the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee declared that a VAT should  be part of the debate.
"There is a growing awareness of  the need for fundamental tax reform," Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.)  said in an interview. "I think a VAT and a high-end income tax  have got to be on the table."
A VAT is a tax on the transfer of goods  and services that ultimately is borne by the consumer. Highly visible,  it would increase the cost of just about everything, from a carton of  eggs to a visit with a lawyer. It is also hugely regressive, falling  heavily on the poor. But VAT advocates say those negatives could be  offset by using the proceeds to pay for health care for every American  -- a tangible benefit that would be highly valuable to low-income families.
 
Liberals dispute that notion. "You  could pay for it regressively and have people at the bottom come out  better off -- maybe. Or you could pay for it progressively and they'd  come out a lot better off," said Bob McIntyre, director of the  nonprofit Citizens for Tax Justice, which has a health financing plan  that targets corporations and the rich.
