Showing posts with label bill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bill. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Obama Signs Bill Giving Tax Cuts, Loan Help to Small Businesses

President Obama signed the fourth job creation measure of the year in to law yesterday, which is expected to be the last before the midterm elections November 2nd. The bill will provide tax cuts to small businesses, and aims to promote job creation.

BusinessWeek.com reports:

Obama signed the Small Business Jobs Act during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House. It is the fourth jobs measure to clear Congress this year and is likely the last before the Nov. 2 midterm congressional elections.

The bill, which won final congressional approval last week, provides billions of dollars worth of tax cuts over the next 12 months, with the bulk coming through “bonus depreciation,” which allows companies to more quickly write off the cost of purchases. It also revives stimulus provisions cutting fees and increasing limits on loan guarantees offered by the Small Business Administration.

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

The Senate’s Wall Street Reform Bill

A few weeks ago the U.S. Senate passed a Wall Street reform bill with a 59 to 39 majority. The legislation is intended to help prevent future bank failures such as those that led to the financial collapse of 2008. The House of Representatives passed a different bill aiming to take on Wall Street back in December, and the two will need to be reconciled before a final package can be sent to the President’s desk. Although all the provisions in the Senate’s legislation may not make it into the final bill, I wanted to take a look at all of the possible tax implications on American consumers.

Curb Abusive Lending Practices

One of the main purposes of the legislation is to “curb abusive lending practices,” but not to punish big banks. There are a number of tactics they will use to help reduce unscrupulous lending, many of which will be explained in this blog entry.

"Our goal is not to punish the banks,” explained President Obama, “but to protect the larger economy and the American people from the kind of upheavals that we've seen in the past few years.”

Bureau of Consumer Protection

To help protect consumers from abusive lending the federal government would setup a new bureau to help Americans. It would have authority to write and enforce rules for nearly any business that offers loans including mortgage companies, payday loan providers, and even car finance companies. The bureau would also create an abuse hotline, and will work to act quickly when new financial companies begin taking advantage of consumers.

Foreclosure Relief for the Unemployed

Another main component of the bill aimed at helping taxpayers is a $3 billion fund to provide relief to struggling homeowners. Although, the details are not entirely clear, the program would lend up to $50,000 to unemployed homeowners whom could likely resume making payments within two years.

Shareholder Rights Over Bonuses

In an obvious response to the public’s anger about the multimillion-dollar bonuses that were given out to executives of bailed-out banks, the Wall Street reform bill gives shareholders the right to cast nonbinding votes on executive pay packages. Additionally, the federal government would be given the power to set standards on excessive compensation deemed unsafe.

Rights for Government Seizures

The legislation would allow the federal government to seize large financial institutions whose difficulties pose a risk to the American financial system. The government would then have the authority to fire executives and wipe out shareholders.

Financial Stability Oversight Council

Once the bill is passed into law, a new Financial Stability Oversight Council will be created by the Treasury. The council will work with companies considered significant to the American financial industry to ensure they meet strict capital, leverage, and liquidity requirements. These companies will also be forced to create systematic plans should they fail.

Future of the Legislation

The Senate and House of Representatives have until July 4, 2010 to present a final package to President Obama. The legislation could change significantly over the next month, however since both chambers of Congress have passed similar bills we can expect that a significant reform package will be signed into law this summer.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Arizona's Bill Is Bad For Business

There has been a lot of media attention placed on the effects of Arizona’s new immigration law and the impact on local residents. However, the bill also includes strict new immigration requirements for business owners. As this article from Forbes.com explains, the law is likely to make doing business in Arizona much more difficult.

SB 1070 is the most extreme anti-business law in recent history. For instance, sections 7 and 8 set out punishments for employers who knowingly or intentionally hire undocumented workers. In both cases for a first offense, the employer has to fire all undocumented workers, sign an affidavit attesting to that and promising not to repeat his mistake, and have all his business licenses suspended.

Additionally, and perhaps most gallingly, the business is then put on a three-year probation (five years for those that intentionally hire undocumented workers) and must file quarterly records to prove that it has not since broken the law again. This would amount to businesses being presumed guilty and being forced to prove their innocence. It will hurt entrepreneurship and endanger the economic recovery.

Most egregiously, if a business commits a second such offense and hires an undocumented worker, all of its business licenses are permanently revoked. Because it is illegal to operate a business without a state-sanctioned license in the state of Arizona, that amounts to the government forcibly shutting down someone's business.

Adam Smith, the father of modern economics, warned against business licensing because it is used to limit competition and entrench politically sanctioned monopolies. It accomplishes that by limiting entry or destroying businesses already in existence. A simple administration revocation of a piece of paper can be used to destroy someone's livelihood. This is not only destructive to business in the short term but sets a dangerous precedent.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

From: “Federal budget: $59 billion here, $300 billion there ...”

Congress is currently mulling over a large collection of bills that has a lot of people concerned over how much these measures are actually going to cost. A major topic of concern is extending the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, which could cost anywhere from several hundred billion dollars to more than $2 trillion.

According to an article on CNNMoney.com, “Some of the measures have already been factored into 10-year deficit projections,” and that yes, many measures are expected to be paid for with revenue-generating provisions, but the total cost of everything under consideration would not be fully offset. Without offsets, we would increase the deficit. “That's in large part because several measures are exempt from the new "pay-as-you-go" law.”

Both parties have favored making the cuts permanent, but that would dramatically worsen the nation’s fiscal problems. Some believe extending them only for a year or two may be the smartest move.

Here is a breakdown of some of the bills that might make the cut and what they cost:

Extension of tax breaks: Dozens of tax breaks for businesses and individuals have lapsed. The cost of extending them for this year is $31 billion. Such "tax extenders" include the research and development credit for businesses and the choice for individuals to deduct either their state and local income tax or their state and local sales tax.

Estate tax: Defying all expectations, Congress let the estate tax lapse at the end of 2009. But it's coming back in 2011. The question is: at what level. Unless Congress acts, starting next year no more than $1 million of a person's estate would be exempt from the estate tax -- which is well below the $3.5 million exemption in place last year. And the top estate tax rate would revert to 55%, up from 45% in effect last year. President Obama has proposed permanently extending the estate tax at 2009 levels, which the Tax Policy Center estimates would cost $234 billion over 10 years. In the Senate, however, a proposal to exempt $5 million and set the top rate at 35% has garnered some bipartisan support. Depending on how various parameters are set, the proposal could cost north of $300 billion.

Safety-net provisions for the unemployed: Some lawmakers are pushing to retain a program that extends the number of weeks an unemployed person may collect federal unemployment benefits. When combined with state benefits, under the program, that means a person can qualify for up to 99 weeks of benefits. But the program expires in June. The measure under consideration would extend it to the end of the year.

Read the full article here.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Dodd to Offer Financial Regulation Bill Without G.O.P.

Fearing that reform was taking to long to come to fruition, Senator Christopher J. Dodd - chairman of the Senate Banking Committee – announced that he would unveil his own financial overhaul plan on Monday. However, what makes this announcement even more surprising is Dodd’s intention to unveil his plan was without negotiation with other members of the Republican party.

Mr. Dodd suggested that he was acting out of a sense of urgency. The House adopted a regulatory overhaul — a priority of the Obama administration — in December on a largely party-line vote. But bipartisan negotiations in the Senate have repeatedly faltered over several critical points, notably the creation of a consumer financial protection agency to regulate mortgages, credit cards and other products.

In an unusual turn, Senator Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the Banking Committee, has found himself largely shut out of the negotiations, while another Republican, Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, has been directly negotiating with Mr. Dodd.

At a news conference later Thursday morning, Mr. Corker called Mr. Dodd’s plan to proceed with a bill without further negotiations “very disappointing.”

Continue reading at NY Times.com…

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Does Fido Deserve a Tax Break?

From BloggingStocks.com:

There is a bill making rounds on Capitol Hill that would provide a tax break for up to $3,500 for pet expenses. Does Fido really deserve a tax deduction? Do we really need to subsidize pet ownership in this country?

The recession has been extra hard on pets as people have abandoned pets at shelters they are no longer able to properly care for them. Pet can be very expensive between food, visits to the vet and increased rent. Those of you who think dog food is expensive should try to feed a horse sometime!

While pet lovers may point to all the positive aspects a man's best friend can bring to a family; if there are tax benefits people may start to get a pet just for the tax benefits. This brings up a lot of interest scenarios. I wonder if the benefit will be per pet or per pound? Would you get the same benefit for a pet mouse as you would for a pet horse? If someone adopts 76 cats do they get to pick up $266,000 in tax breaks? And what happens when you feed the pet mice to the pet snake?

If the bill were to pass it would certainly be good for companies in the Pet Care Industry like PetSmart (NASDAQ: PETM), Petmeds Express (NASDAQ: PETS), and Tractor Supply (NASDAQ: TSCO).

Some Congressman may have written this bill just to please some a pet loving constituent knowing it is unlikely to pass. I thought there were some real issues like a recession, unemployment and $1.4 trillion deficit that lawmakers could keep busy with.

While everyone loves Fido and Fluffy, should they really get a tax break?

Monday, March 02, 2009

Anti-Tax Haven Bill Coming: U.S. Senate Aides

From Reuters.com:

Offshore tax havens used by rich Americans in Switzerland, the Cayman Islands and other nations are targeted for shutdown by a bill to be offered in the U.S. Senate on Monday, said senior Senate aides.

In legislation that expands on a bill co-sponsored last year with then-Senator Barack Obama, Senator Carl Levin will propose a broad crackdown on tax avoidance schemes estimated to deprive the U.S. government of more than $100 billion a year.

The bill comes just two days ahead of a Senate hearing where a senior UBS AG executive is due to testify about an investigation of the Swiss banking giant.

"Offshore tax haven and tax shelter abuses are undermining the integrity of our tax system," said Levin in a statement given to Reuters. "We cannot tolerate $100 billion in offshore tax abuses burning a hole through our budget each year.

"We can fight back against secrecy jurisdictions and shut down offshore tax abuses if we have the political will."

Companion legislation is expected to be introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, the aides said.

Both bills will face committee review and some political opposition. Bankers at UBS and other financial institutions have long been among the largest contributors to U.S. politicians' campaigns.

Since last year, three provisions have been added to the Senate bill. One would classify U.S.-controlled foreign corporations as domestic for income tax purposes. Another would close an offshore tax dividend loophole that lets people dodge payment of U.S. taxes on U.S. stock dividends, the aides said.

The third provision would expand tax-reporting requirements for passive foreign investment corporations, they said.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

US House Passes Minimum Wage Tax Breaks

The US House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved small business tax breaks to be attached to the new minimum wage bill in a 360-45 vote on Friday. The House tax breaks include over 1.8 billion dollars in tax cuts compared to 8.3 billion the Senate approved on a similar minimum wage bill. Although House Democrats had originally hoped to pass the minimum wage bill without any associated tax breaks, it saw problems in the Senate where it was feared the bill would not receive any necessary Republican votes without including small business tax breaks. According to Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus it should take two or three weeks for House and Senate negotiators to reconcile the two variations into one bill. Source: Yahoo News.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Senate Tax Writing Committee Approves Tax Breaks

The bill that proposed an increase to the minimum wage and that was approved by the U.S. House of representatives was met with some changes in the U.S. Senate Tax Writing Committee. Democratic leaders in the Senate opted to add over eight billion dollars in tax relief aimed at helping small businesses that typically hire minimum wage workers. It is expected that the bill will now be approved in the Senate, avoiding a fight with business lobbyists and possible filibusters. Visit Mail Tribune for more details on the new minimum wage bill.

Blog Archive