Earlier in the week a New York court  handed down its decision in the state's case against Amazon.com. New  York requires businesses without property in the state to collect taxes  if they receive revenue from affiliates located in the state. Essentially  the court is asking for more information and did not strike down the  law or dismiss challenges against it.
In Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and  other cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that states can tax interstate  commerce only if the target company has a "nexus" with the  state - property or employees in the state. Otherwise, the Court has  held, there is a serious threat to interstate commerce as states try  to impose thousands of sales taxes, each with different rules.
 
The New York court's opinion was  13 months in coming, and it neither dismisses all challenges against  the statute as the trial judge had, nor does it strike the statute down  as unconstitutional. Indeed, the specific ruling by the majority is  to send the case back to the trial court to further develop the record.  The majority says the key unresolved question is how significant the  affiliates are for Amazon's operations in New York and whether they  actively solicit.
Amazon argued that affiliate referrals  represent just 1.5% of their sales in the state. The court acknowledges  this but says they need more information to determine significance.  In a footnote, they suggest that a high dollar figure could be significant  regardless of proportion. This is a mistake - significance to operations  should be a judgment based on the proportion of the whole operation,  not just a dollar threshold.
The Court rightly emphasizes that  advertising does not create nexus. However, the opinion ominously notes  that the challenged law would be valid if "a New York representative  uses some form of proactive solicitation which results in a sale by  Amazon, and a commission to the representative; and the representative  has an in-state presence sufficient to satisfy the substantial nexus  test." What they forget is the significance to operations test,  which they emphasize elsewhere. Solicitation plus sales creates nexus  for the affiliates, but it shouldn't create nexus for Amazon.