Thursday, May 22, 2008
1. It Sounds Good
A federal “gas tax holiday,” it just sounds so nice. With record high temperatures, a weakening economy, and an increased cost of living, don’t we deserve an extra holiday this summer?
2. You’ll Save $30 Bucks
Some estimates actually say that the average American will save as much as $60-$100. However, no matter what the actual savings amount turns out to be, it is still free money.
3. Immediate Stimulus
In addition to the benefit of getting free money, it would also be immediate. Every time you pumped gas into your car you will get the discount. You will not have to wait months and months for a rebate check to arrive – instead you will get instant savings.
4. Everyone Benefits
Although not everyone would benefit equally from the gas tax holiday (people who use public transportation would not really benefit), the holiday is designed to give everyone who uses a car some relief.
5. Other Reduced Prices
Because of the increased gas prices the cost of other products is also being raised. In addition, some companies such as airlines or shipping stores are adding a fuel surcharge to their products. Hopefully the benefits of a gas tax holiday would pass down to those purchasing these other products as well.
6. Will Not Increase Costs
Many economists are arguing that the gas tax break would do nothing as it would increase demand and raise prices. However, supporters of the holiday claim that since fuel is traded on the world market the actual effects on demand would be negligible.
7. Revenue from Oil Companies
To make up for the loss of federal revenue some are hoping to raise taxes on the large oil corporations who are seeing billions in profits. This would mean that the federal government would not have to cut construction jobs.
8. Pressure on OPEC
In addition to taxes on the oil companies, another idea surrounding the gas tax holiday is to pressure OPEC to release more fuel and help lower the demand. Although it would help lower prices, this is probably more of a downside as it continues to encourage reliance on foreign oils.
Flat is not simple, at least not with taxes.
Top 10 habits of successful small business owners.
Problems with economic stimulus checks.
Pressure builds on Cindy McCain to release her tax Returns.
The Ten Commandments of sales.
Defend your business rights – intellectual property defined
Ask-a-recruiter: when should lawyers change jobs?
Will I need to report my economic stimulus check as income?
“A growing number of economists believe the country is on the brink of a recession or in one already, dragged down by all the problems in housing, credit and financial markets. Now 56% of the economists think the economy has started or will enter a recession this year. That's up from 45% in a survey in February. If there is a recession, it probably will be short and shallow, economists said.”
“Forecasters downgraded their projections for economic growth. They now predict the economy, which grew by 2.2% last year, will slow to 1.4% this year. That is lower than the 1.8% growth projected in February. If the new figure proves correct, it would mark the weakest growth since the last recession in 2001.”
Monday, May 19, 2008
When it comes to campaigning, it is all about choosing the right words to use in your marketing. Anyone who remembers the phrases “weapons of mass destruction,” or “axis of evil” will know what I mean (how many times did we hear those phrases in the lead up to Operation: Iraqi Freedom?). In this election cycle, Senator Obama has made a strong effort to push the word “change,” which explains why the word is visible in almost every picture you see of Obama. Nonetheless the phrase “gas tax holiday” is merely another political slogan designed to encourage Americans to vote for a candidate.
2. Loss of Federal Revenue
If the federal government stopped collecting a tax on fuel, then it will be a direct loss of revenue for the government, plain and simple. With our economy continuing in a downward spiral, record breaking military expenses in the middle east, an ever increasing national debt, I doubt the government can afford to lose this source of revenue, let alone any.
3. Direct Impact on Working Families
If the government does not have revenue from gas taxes, then it is going to have a direct effect on people working in the construction industry. The tax levied on gasoline and diesel is what pays for highway and road construction. Without this money, the government would not be able to pay those working in this industry. Some estimates put the number of lost jobs at over 300,000, which does seem slightly inflated to me. However, any reduction of the tax collected from gasoline will definitely result in lost jobs.
4. Poor Quality Roads
The lack of federal transportation revenue will impact more then just those working in construction. The condition of our roads and highways is deteriorating, and without revenue to fix them the condition will only get worse. So a gas tax holiday may save you some money this summer, but you will probably regret the money this fall when you are stuck in hours of traffic on your way to work.
5. State Gas Taxes
The gas tax holiday only applies to the federal excise tax of 18.4 cents on gasoline and 24.4 on for diesel. However, these are not the only taxes that consumers pay on fuel. Nearly every state has their own tax, and some are upwards of 40 cents per gallon. The gas tax holiday would do nothing about these state fuel taxes.
6. Bad Message
Earlier in the week, polar bears were officially added to the added to the endangered species list. What does that have to do with a gas tax holiday? Well, exhaust fumes are bad for the environment and could lead to pollution and harm to the environment. Also, with the added threat of global warming looming, shouldn’t the government be discouraging motorists from using excess gasoline? In Europe, the taxes on fuel are higher then in the United States and consequently there is less gas consumption. If anything, our government should be encouraging people to reduce their gas consumption. How about increasing hybrid credits?
7. Increased Demand = Higher Prices
Many economists are claiming that lower prices will correlate directly to an increase in demand, which on the open market will likely increase the cost of fuel. Some argue that since gasoline is traded on the world market that we will not see a price increase. However, it is obvious that if gas was cheaper people would use more of it.
8. Continued Record Oil Profits
With the increased demand that would result from a gas tax holiday, some estimate that it would give even more revenue to the big oil corporations. These corporations already post record breaking profits every quarter for the last five years. Instead of lowering fuel taxes on consumers, why not increase taxes on the oil corporations?
9. Does Not Solve Anything
A gas tax holiday ignores the bigger problem; this country is dependent on foreign oil. It will do nothing to solve this problem. Gas prices are increasing at alarming rates and a small tax break is not going to stop prices from increasing in the long run.
10. Bottom Line: 30 Bucks
Let’s face it, all you really get under a gas tax holiday is about $30. Some estimates from Senator Clinton’s and Senator McCain’s camp say that this number is slightly higher, maybe $50. But what kind of effect is a $50 tax credit really going to have on the nation’s economy?
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
This is the third and final entry in my deeper look at the presidential candidate’s tax views. Unlike Clinton and Obama, McCain’s economic views represent the views of conservatives with tax cuts for higher income individuals and no tax increases.
Make Tax Increases More Difficult
One of the most radical tax views of McCain is his desire to make additional tax increases more difficult. He hopes to follow California Republicans in requiring a 3/5 super majority for any tax increases. This will, in effect, give the minority in congress more power and leverage to negotiate trades for important votes. However, in given the current economic uncertainty, such a barrier could have devastating effects. This is especially the case under McCain’s plan to increase our military presence around the world. It will cost the government billions of dollars. But without proper funding, a war cannot continue. Yet, with McCain’s plan it would be difficult to pass tax increases to cover these military expenses.
Alternative Flat Tax System
Although McCain does not support an outright switch to a flat tax, he is making strides towards one. Like any Republican, McCain is not a big fan of our current progressive tax system. His plan is to expand the 15% tax bracket to lower taxes on millions of middle income Americans. Under his plan, the ceiling for the 15% bracket would increase from $43,050 to $70,000 for married couples filing jointly, and from $25,750 to $35,000 for single taxpayers.
The more revolutionary aspect of his plan is the offering of an optional flat tax system. This system would be held out as an alternative to the current progressive system and the myriad of credits, exemptions, deductions, carryover rules, and different tax rates for different forms of income. McCain’s plan would be to tax all taxpayers on all income sources at one single rate. The flat rate would be set at 19% for first two years, 17% thereafter.
McCain’s tax cut plan is estimated to cost the federal government about $240 billion in the next five years, and over $500 in 10 years. However, these are early estimates and with current inflation levels, his plan could cost even more.
When speaking about his plan to fix the tax code, McCain claimed that, "the tax code now requires $140 billion of American families' income to prepare their tax returns." Unfortunately, he greatly overestimated this number. The exact cost attributed to individual taxpayers was only $65 billion, and some estimate the total at a much lower $20 billion. Although McCain's camp said he was drawing his figures from a 2005 report by the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, the study was not just on families, it included both individual and business taxes
Gas Tax Holiday
The Gas Tax Holiday is one of the few tax proposals that are supported by both McCain and Clinton. As I have mentioned before, this plan is to stop the collection of federal taxes on gasoline and diesel from Memorial Day to Labor Day. Currently the federal government collects an excise tax in the amount of 18.4 cents for gasoline and a 24.4 cents for diesel. Some estimates have cited average savings of $70 per person, but the exact numbers are widely disputed.
Although the phrase “gas tax holiday” sounds good, this holiday is getting a lot of criticism for being nothing more then a campaign gimmick. Within a few days of the announcement 200 of the top economists came forward saying the plan was worthless. Many claim that lower prices would lead to more demand, and only the big oil companies would get anything out of the holiday.
Repeal Alternative Minimum Tax
In addition to lowering taxes on middle income families, McCain also wants to repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), which would basically be a tax cut for the upper middle income taxpayers.
“I believe that we've got to simplify the tax code,” claims McCain. “But one of the first areas we've got to go after is the alternate minimum tax, which is going to eat in to 20 million American families if we don't eliminate it, and very quickly.”
Although the AMT is very unpopular it generates billions of dollars in federal revenue. In addition, remember that the president does not have the power to just remove a tax – only congress does. If McCain wants this tax fully repealed, then he is going to have to strike a deal with congress, and it seems highly unlikely that he would get enough support to make this drastic change.
Extend President Bush Tax Cuts
Although McCain had originally voted against the Bush tax cuts, he now claims to support an extension of the plan. “I voted to extend them because it would have the effect of having a tax increase,” claimed McCain when asked about his flip-flop. “The tax cuts have increased revenues enormously. They've been very beneficial. The problem is that spending has lurched completely out of control. My proposal was to restrain spending. I do not support tax increases. And the effect of not making them permanent would have the effect of a tax increase.”
Unfortunately, changing your view on important issues is suicide for a presidential hopeful. Think back to the 2004 election, and how strongly the Bush campaign pushed the flip-flop label on John Kerry. Voters do not tend to vote for someone they feel will flip on an issue, yet if McCain wants to win the election he is going to need to.
Cut Corporate Tax Rates
Another tax cut McCain supports is cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 25%. The United States has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world. If we want businesses to stay in this country then we need to keep our tax rates competitive. McCain’s plan does just that.
Revisions to Charitable Contributions
Another controversial component of McCain’s tax plan is his hope to revise the current laws on charitable contributions. Under his plan, taxpayers that give charitable contributions in the form of stock, real estate, bonds, or artwork would not be able to take a tax deduction for the current, inflated value of the gift. Instead, they would only be allowed to take a deduction for the original cost of the asset.
McCain claims this would only affect the richest Americans who take advantage of this loophole to reduce their tax liabilities. However, the plan has been met with loud criticism. The current administration has publicly stated “anything that would take money away from a charity is a step in the wrong direction.”
“Wealthy Americans shouldn’t get a tax write-off for contributing a fancy painting or an overvalued stock,” responded a spokesperson for McCain. “Bush is protecting his wealthy donor base at the expense of the middle class.”
Health Insurance Tax Credit
When it comes to health care, McCain wants to give more responsibility and control to individual patients. His plan would remove current tax breaks given to employers to provide health insurance, and replace it with a $5,000 credit to families who purchase their own health care. He suggests that it would encourage choice and competition in the market, thus lowering current prices. “I’ll work tirelessly to address the problem,” Mr. McCain claimed in a speech at the University of South Florida. “But I won’t create another entitlement program that Washington will let get out of control. I won’t do it. Nor will I saddle states with another unfunded mandate.”
Former UBS banker charged in tax evasion case.
Quelle surprise! Tax rebates looking increasingly ineffective.
It's not the title of tax legislation that matters.
Tax evasion kills 1,000 children every day.
Tax and expands in Japan, Singapore, Ukraine, Curacao and Panama.
How to achieve business excellence.
What makes a business leader successful?
According to the Bloomberg and Los Angeles Times investor poll, “69 percent of upper-income investors say a raise in the capital gains tax to 20 percent from 15 percent wouldn't cause them to sell assets they would otherwise hold.”
“The poll of 2,208 adults nationwide included 607 investors with household incomes of at least $100,000 and was conducted May 1 to May 8. The investor group has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.”
The nationwide poll has a large sample size, and was conducted by two credible news outlets. However, the poll does not mention how investors would react to Obama’s plan to nearly double the Capital Gains tax rate. I assume that it would be a lot lower then 69 percent.
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
According to the report, Sharpton’s lawyers have been trying to negotiate with the federal government for about a year. They are disputing the total debt amount, and have been trying to pay off some of the debt related to unpaid workers compensation and unemployment insurance. However, Sharpton is not accepting full blame for the tax liability and points to problems in the government.
"Whatever retaliation they do on me, we never stop," Sharpton told the AP. "I think that that is why they try to intimidate us. The infrastructure was trying to keep up with that pace, and it was not a perfect fit. The National Action Network may not have been perfect, but nothing was going on that was untoward."
It warms my heart to hear stories like this one. For those of you who do not already know, I absolutely love baseball, and have been playing my entire life. At the age of 11, I became the first female in the history of California to play little league baseball on an all boys’ team. Then when I was 12, I was selected as an All-star player. But Gabby takes the cake.
I strongly encourage Gabby to continue doing what she loves, and to not be concerned about gender stereotypes or what anyone else has to say. Follow your dreams, and do not let anything stand in your way.
“As I settle in to my new role, it becomes clearer to me each day what a privilege it is to be the Commissioner of the IRS. I am taking every opportunity to listen and learn — both internally with the IRS workforce, and externally with important constituencies: Congress, taxpayers, tax practitioners, foreign tax authorities, and other colleagues in the federal government.”
“We must continue on the path to modernizing the IRS. When I think of modernizing, I am not merely speaking about building new technology. We need to ensure that our systems, processes and people reflect the changing environment in which both individual taxpayers and businesses operate.”
“Another critical issue is our need to target the root causes of noncompliance, and look for opportunities to improve voluntary compliance rates.”
“In my view, a crucial part of the path forward is through increased transparency. When all parties are working from the same information, the opportunity for miscommunication and misunderstanding decreases dramatically. But transparency alone is not sufficient. With transparency comes the need for trust among the players in the tax system, and a responsibility of the tax authorities to use information appropriately.”
Thursday, May 08, 2008
Yesterday the IRS put out this press release announcing that they had put together a list of answers to the most common questions about the economic stimulus package. Below are some of the questions and answers, but to see the full page check out Economic Stimulus Payments: Most Frequently Asked Questions on IRS.gov.
Q. When will I get my payment?
A. Payments are going out now for those returns processed by April 15 and will continue on a weekly schedule through mid-July. See the payment schedule for both direct deposit and paper checks for further information. Payments will continue through 2008 for returns filed after April 15.
Q. I filed after April 15 and the payment date for my Social Security number has passed. How long will it take for me to get my stimulus payment?
A. It will generally take a minimum of six weeks after you file your return to get your stimulus payment.
Q. Will the IRS allow me to provide it with direct deposit information, if I did not include that information on my original tax return?
A. You cannot correct direct deposit information or request a direct deposit after a return has been filed.
Q. Is there something I can do to prevent my stimulus payment from being automatically deposited into the account that I identified for the direct deposit of my regular refund?
A. Generally, if you designated direct deposit on a tax return, the stimulus payment will go to the account number you designated. If the account number is no longer active, the IRS will send you a paper check. This process may take several weeks.
After discussing the Gas Tax Holiday in my deeper look at Hilary Clinton’s tax views, I wanted to learn more about the proposal. Therefore, earlier today the tax experts of the Roni Deutch Tax Center™ posted an entry to the RDTC Tax Help Blog titled The Facts About A Gas Tax Holiday. Enjoy the snippet below, or check out the full article.
Over the past week, the phrase "gas tax holiday" went from something no one knew about to a phrase being blasted through all media outlets. But what exactly is a gas tax holiday? Is it a new federal holiday that will give us all another three-day weekend? And will a gas tax holiday do anything for our downward spiraling economy?
The phrase "gas tax holiday" refers to a proposal from presidential hopefuls Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. John McCain to suspend the federal excise tax on gasoline from Memorial Day to Labor Day. It is a direct result of the eve-rising fuel prices that are expected to surpass $4 per gallon later this summer.
With only a few primaries left many people are pointing to Sen. Barack Obama as the victor of the Democratic nomination. However, Sen. Hillary Clinton is still committed to finishing the race on the claim that she is more likely to beat Sen. John McCain in the general election, and she does have statistics from national polls to back up her claims. The only hope for Clinton is if the delegates decide to give her the nomination since neither candidate will get the required number of delegates through the election cycle. Nevertheless, since Hillary is still considered one of the candidates for the Democratic nomination, I included her in my in-depth look at the candidate’s tax plans.
Gas Tax Holiday
Clinton’s support of a gas tax holiday has become a key component of her campaign in the remaining primary elections, however it has caused her more negative criticism than positive. At first the idea of a gas tax holiday seems like a good one. People across the nation are complaining about increases in the cost of fueling their vehicles and they want to get relief. By endorsing the gas tax holiday, it seemed like Clinton was making a good campaign move by showing Americans that she understood their hardships and wanted to do something about it.
However, soon it was clear to many that a gas tax holiday was little more then just a good campaign talking point. If enacted, experts agree that the holiday would do little to help the American consumers. Federal excise taxes on gasoline are under 20 cents per gallon, and eliminating the tax would do little to counterbalance the ever-increasing price on fuel. Additionally, by eliminating the tax it would cost the federal government upwards of $125 million that would usually go to federal road repairs and infrastructure improvements.
Finally, there is the problem of supply and demand, which I personally think has been slightly over-exaggerated. The argument is that with lower prices the demand would increase and there would be little benefit to consumers. However, its important to remember that the tax holiday would only apply to American taxpayers, and that the effects on the world market would be negligible.
Let Bush Tax Cuts Expire
Clinton and Obama are on the same page when it comes to President Bush’s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts – let them expire. In a democratic debate Clinton took a firm stand on this issue claiming, "I will make it clear that the Bush tax cuts on the upper income, those making more than $250,000 a year, will be allowed to expire."
"I will let the taxes on people making more than $250,000 a year go back to the rates that they were paying in the 1990s," she continued. Hillary has gone to great efforts to promote the fact that she wants to increase taxes on only the wealthiest Americans, not the middle class. However, conservative and "Reagan Democrat" voters often react negatively to any type of tax increase, regardless if it will directly affect their paychecks. If Hillary does win the nomination, she will need to really drive home the fact that the increase will not affect middle to higher middle income Americans.
Extend Low Income Tax Credits
Although Clinton does not favor as much lower income credits as Obama, she still does support extending additional credits targeting people living on low wages. One of the tax credits Clinton supports is extending the Child Tax Credit to cover the first year of a child’s life. Clinton aims to make it easier for parents to stay home and care for newborn children. "Our tax policies do not reflect the cost of raising children," claims Clinton. "We should expand the child tax credit for the first year of a child's life to help parents stay home and give lower-income parents who receive government support for child care the option to sue the subsidies to cover the costs of staying home and caring for their own children." Clinton’s plan to increase low income tax credits may sound nice, but without reducing their overall tax burdens, small credits can only do so much to help someone get out of poverty.
Strengthening the Middle Class
The biggest part of Hillary’s tax proposal is to help strengthen the middle class. "I am absolutely committed to not raising a single tax on middle class Americans," claimed Clinton. "In fact, I have a very specific plan of $100 billion in tax cuts. My priorities are middle-class tax cuts and support for the middle class, to make college affordable, retirement security possible, health insurance affordable."
The phrase "strengthen the middle class" is a great campaign move on Clinton’s behalf as studies show that people like to consider themselves middle class regardless of their actual income. Both the phrases lower class, and upper class have negative connotations so targeting the "middle class" has helped Hillary appeal to the general public. However, the government needs to make money somehow, and Clinton cannot expect to only raise taxes on the highest income individuals. The public does not generally favor unbalanced tax increases, and it will be difficult for Clinton to drastically increase taxes on the wealthiest while lowering taxes for everyone else.
Revise AMT & Index to Inflation
Although Clinton previously voted against reducing the AMT (alternative minimum tax) in the Senate, she now appears to support some revisions to the highly unpopular tax. "I'll tell you something that we are going to have to deal with, the alternative minimum tax, which falls heavily on a lot of you and your families," claimed Clinton at the 2007 IAFF Presidential Forum. "You know, for six years I've been saying, with all due respect, do the billionaires in America need more tax cuts? Don't you think we ought to cut the taxes of middle income people, in particular those who are going to be hit by the alternative minimum tax?"
As the AMT impacts more and more families the tax is being considered widely unpopular, and is something that all the candidates are striving to fix. However, along with Clinton’s overall plan to strengthen the middle class, you have to wonder where all this extra money is coming from? All the tax cuts and credits would cost the government billions of dollars in lost revenue, and I am doubtful it could all be made up for with taxes on the rich.
Affordable College Education
At the heart of her plan to strengthen the middle class is Hillary’s tax cuts designed to make college more affordable for everyone. "When it comes to higher education – we shouldn’t be playing catch-up with the world – we should be leading it," claimed Clinton in a press release about her plan. "I believe that college shouldn’t just be a privilege for the wealthy – but an opportunity for anyone with the talent, determination and ambition to learn. And I believe that every American should have access to lifelong learning opportunities – from apprenticeships, to community college, to the most select four-year institutions."
Hillary’s college plan would basically boil down to a $3,500 credit which she claims is enough to cover more than 50% of the cost of tuition at the average public institution. But with rising community college prices, and ten thousand dollar per semester bills at many universities, I wonder how big of an impact this credit will actually have?
Small Capital Gain Increase
Although Clinton has not gave an official yes or no on increasing the Capital Gain tax rate, she has noted that if she did increase the rate it wouldn’t be by much. "I wouldn't raise it above the 20% if I raised it at all," notes Clinton. Although a small increase would not generate as much revenue as Obama’s plan to nearly double the tax rate, it seems much more "doable." The increase would still generate billions of dollars in new revenue but would not have a massive impact on Americans who invest.
Economic Military Changes
Although her military and security plans do not have a direct impact on the taxes paid by Americans, it will have an impact on the country’s budget that will trickle down to taxpayers. Included in Clinton’s proposal are a few costly measures, including: redeployment of troops in Iraq, increased commitment to Afghanistan and Pakistan, increased military research budgets, and a pay raise for wartime troops.
Wednesday, May 07, 2008
As we get closer to the general election, the candidates’ tax views are becoming major components of their respective campaigns. In the beginning of the primary election, no one was talking taxes. But because of my love of taxes, I frequently blogged about the candidates’ tax positions. Now, with the current economic state (i.e. mortgage crisis, ever-increasing gas prices, etc.), people are thinking about taxes.
With only three major candidates left in the election cycle, I figured it would be timely to take a more detailed look at each candidate’s individual tax views. In this first entry, I review Senator Barack Obama's tax plan, as well as some of his other proposals that will likely have tax consequences or an economic impact on the country.
Higher Taxes on Top Earning Americans
Senator Obama is a big believer in our progressive tax system – and he is not afraid to hide that. So one of the first things Obama is set to do is letting President Bush’s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts to selectively expire. "There's no doubt that the tax system has been skewed. And the Bush tax cuts – people didn't need them, they weren't even asking for them," claimed Senator Obama during a debate. By "selectively expire", Obama endorses extending those tax cuts on the rates for all but the top two income tax brackets.
In addition to letting the Bush tax cuts expire, Obama also advocates increasing the income cap on payroll taxes. This would essentially be a huge tax increase for taxpayers earning between $97,000.00 and $250,000.00, which goes against Obama’s prior commitment to not raise taxes on individuals making less than $250,000.00. Although higher taxes on the rich is a popular thought for many liberals, you cannot expect to only tax the rich and cut taxes for the poor. The American public is not likely to support unbalanced tax increases and this could harm his chances in the general election.
Close Corporate Loop-Holes
Another major component of Obama’s tax plan is to close hundreds of corporate "loop-holes" that allow massive corporations to questionably reduce their tax liability. "Instead of having all of us pay our fair share, we've got over $1 trillion worth of loopholes in the corporate tax code," he claimed. "This isn't the invisible hand of the market at work. It's the successful work of special interests." This plan would be highly efficient at creating new revenue for the federal government, but at what cost? Huge corporations are already moving factories and offices to countries with cheaper labor and more favorable corporate taxes. If the tax rates increase too much, then more corporations would likely move out of the country and it could result in thousands of lost jobs.
Senior Citizen Tax Breaks
Although it seems like an attempt to get the attention of the "senior voters" and the AARP, Obama is hoping to provide relief to millions of seniors struggling to make ends meet. His plan would eliminate federal taxes on seniors making less then $50,000.00 per year, which would account for $7 million dollars in total relief. It seems quite unlikely that the country would get behind this tax plan. I also have my own reservations – what about single mothers making less than $50,000 per year – that I expressed in a previous entry.
Make Work Pay Tax Credit
With his Make Work Pay tax credit, Obama is hoping to encourage Americans to take control of their lives, while providing tax relief to both low and middle income taxes. "I'd reward work by providing an income tax cut of up to $500 per person – or $1,000 for each working family – to offset the payroll tax that they're already paying," claimed Obama. "Because this credit would be greater than their income tax bill, my proposal would effectively eliminate all income taxes for 10 million working Americans."
Capital Gain Tax Increase
Obama’s desire to increase the Capital Gains rate is probably the biggest actual increase of his tax plan. The current tax rate on Capital Gains is 15%, and Obama hopes to raise it to 28%
"At a time when Americans are working harder than ever, we are taxing income from work at nearly twice the level that we're taxing gains for investors," Obama said. "We've lost the balance between work and wealth."
Although the Capital Gains tax rate is much lower today than it was a decade ago, it is being levied on a lot more people. Investing is not only for the rich, as there are millions of middle income Americans investing in stocks, retirement accounts, and mutual funds. In a time of a looming economic recession, we should be encouraging sound investment and savings strategies. Raising the capital gains rate is not going to do that.
Mortgage Relief for Homeowners
"Ten of the country's largest mortgage lenders spent $185 million lobbying Washington so they could keep engaging in destructive practices," claimed Obama. "And they got what they paid for. To help fix this problem Obama wants to create more accountability in the mortgage industry. In addition, he intends to pursue more tax breaks for current homeowners. Specifically, Obama announced intentions to "create a 10 percent universal mortgage credit to provide homeowners who do not itemize tax relief."
Because it is a credit, individuals claiming the standard deduction would have access to it. Currently, mortgage interest is a deduction that can only be claimed by itemizing your deductions on your tax return. The credit would provide about $500 to 10 million homeowners in this country, mainly for individuals making less than $50,000 per year.
IRS & Tax Return Reform
One of the most interesting things about Obama’s tax proposal is his idea of reforming the IRS and the way American’s file their tax returns. The good thing about his suggestion is that it is a smaller form of revamping the IRS – unlike other candidates who want to dissolve the IRS completely. Obama claims that his simplified tax code would allow anyone with a bank account to complete their taxes in minutes – as long as they take the standard deduction. Part of his plan includes using pre-filled tax forms. "There's no reason the IRS can't send Americans pre-filled tax forms to verify," Obama said. "This means no more worry. No more wasted time. No more extra expenses for a tax preparer."
Although more realistic than completely dissolving the IRS, Obama’s plan is still fraught with problems. While in a perfect world, the IRS could send pre-filled tax returns and people could easily file their returns. However, we do not live in a perfect world. Implementing a plan to simplify tax returns could create large problems for the IRS. They already have enough trouble tracking down taxpayers, let alone sending them accurate pre-filled income tax returns. Additionally, this program would open the floodgates for large-scale identity theft problems. The information contained in a taxpayers return is highly sensitive and everyone knows that standard mail is not exactly 100% secure.
Revamp the AMT
Although Obama voted "nay" on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), he does support a revamp of the tax. The specific details of his plan are a bit hazy, but Obama has claimed he would like to index the tax according to inflation so that it does not affect middle-income Americans. However, with dozens of social plans that cost billions of dollars to operate, the idea of reducing a tax that generates so much revenue for the government seems unlikely.
American Opportunity Tax Credit
One of Obama’s more popular tax views is to help make higher education more affordable for Americans by creating a credit to reimburse taxpayers for the costs of obtaining a college education. According to his plan, the credit would reimburse taxpayers on the first $4,000.00 they spend on a college education, and will cover two-thirds of the cost of attending a public college or university.
Immigration Reform and Undocumented Immigrant Taxes
Obama wants to reform the way the federal government deals with undocumented immigrants. Obama’s plan does have tax consequences, as it would not only require illegal aliens to file tax returns and pay income taxes, but would also require them to pay back taxes and the associated penalties and interest. If this idea became reality, it could account for millions of dollars in additional federal revenue. And, by not including tax amnesty in his immigration reform, Obama preemptively "plucks" a feather from the anti-immigration reform movement. It also preemptively stops American citizens from lobbying for similar treatment for their own unfiled tax returns and IRS back taxes.
Increased Foreign Aid
Although not included in his tax plan, Obama does support a healthy increase for money the federal government provides in foreign relief. He has proposed a comprehensive African HIV / AIDS strategy that will provide $50 billion in relief by 2013, and a global poverty fighting strategy that will provide between $25 and $50 billion in relief by 2012. The source of these funds is still unclear, however we can assume the money will come from some of Obama’s tax increases on the wealthy.
Clinton-McCain gas tax holiday slammed as bad idea.
States get in on calls for a gas tax holiday.
Duff & Phelps announces formation of strategic tax advisory services practice.
Dollars for defense: war, taxes, and sacrifice.
Finally, an economist supports Hillary’s gas holiday.
Who said taxes were fair?
Lynda J. Mead, of Washington, pleaded not guilty in her initial appearance before the U.S. District Court in Seattle this morning. She is facing a total of eight counts of willful failure to pay her federal income taxes.
Ms. Mead has been accused of failing to pay the IRS over $357,000 that she withheld from employee’s paychecks. Her trial is scheduled on July 14 before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.
Although payroll taxes can be confusing they are very important. My law firm gets dozens of calls per day from small business owners who are confused by payroll taxes and now find themselves in debt to the IRS.
While my firm can help, it is better to ensure that you never find yourself with IRS payroll tax liability in the first place. The best way is to ensure that someone who understands payroll taxes is administering your payroll. If you do not have a competent payroll administrator on staff and / or cannot figure out how to handle payroll taxes on your own, then seek-out a third-party payroll administrator.
- ► 2010 (1177)
- ► 2009 (987)
- 8 Reasons to Support a Gas Tax Holiday
- Latest Good Reads
- Economists Predict Credit Crisis Nearing an End
- Top 10 Reasons a Gas Tax Holiday is a Bad Idea
- Sen. John McCain: a Deeper Look at his Tax Views
- Latest Good Reads
- Study Shows Capital Gains Increase Won’t Impact In...
- Another Tax Case in the Media
- Local Teen Girl Plays on Boy’s Baseball Team
- IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman Speaks to ABA
- IRS Has Answers to Stimulus Package Questions
- Facts About the Gas Tax Holiday
- Sen. Hillary Clinton: a Deeper Look at her Tax Vie...
- Sen. Barack Obama: a Deeper Look at his Tax Views
- Latest Good Reads
- Another Tax Case in the Media
- ▼ May (16)
- ► 2007 (191)